Guidelines on Blood Cultures

Article Outline

• Abstract
• References
• Copyright

Just over one-third of sepsis patients have positive blood cultures, mainly due to inadequate sampling volumes (50% of adults have < 1.0 CFU/mL blood) and the prior use of antibiotics. However, 20–30% of sepsis patients are given inappropriate empirical antibiotics. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines recommend paired culture sets to help discriminate between contaminant organisms and true pathogens; four 10-mL bottles (2 sets) should be used for the initial evaluation to detect about 90–95% of bacteremias and six 10-mL bottles (3 sets) should be used to detect about 95–99% of bacteremias. It has also been shown that the positivity rate increased by 15–35% with resin-based media in patients on antibiotics. For diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections, differential time-to-positivity is one method recommended to help determine whether the catheter is truly the source of infection. The proper training of personnel with regard to drawing an appropriate blood volume and the importance of clear labeling of culture bottles is also of critical importance. Furthermore, if the contamination rate is relatively high, hiring dedicated staff who are well-trained in order to get a lower blood culture contamination rate may be cost-effective. It is because high false-positive blood culture rates due to contamination are associated with significantly increased hospital and laboratory charges.

Keywords:  antibiotics , bacteremia , blood cultures , resin-based media

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

Back to Article Outline

References 

1. Wilson ML . Outpatient blood cultures: progress and unanswered questions . Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis . 2004;23:879–880
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
2. Weinstein MP , Towns ML , Quartey SM , Mirrett S , Reimer LG , Parmigiani G , et al.   The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults . Clin Infect Dis . 1997;24:584–602
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)  . Principles and Procedures for Blood Cultures; Approved Guideline. CLSI document M47-A . Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007;
   • View In Article
4. Weinstein MP , Reller LB , Murphy JR , Lichtenstein KA . The clinical significance of positive blood cultures; a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults . Rev Infect Dis . 1983;5:35–53
   • View In Article
   • MEDLINE
5. Cockerill FR , Wilson JW , Vetter EA , Goodman KM , Torgerson CA , Harmsen WS , et al.   Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures . Clin Infect Dis . 2004;38:1724–1730
   • View In Article
   • CrossRef
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  . National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) NIOSH Alert: Preventing Needlestick Injuries in Health Care Settings, 1999. Publication No. 2000-108 . Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2000-108/ [Date accessed: May 23, 2010]
   • View In Article